Federal screening flags fraudulent FAFSAs before they reach you. Identity confirmation, verification, conflicting information, and professional judgment still land on your staff.
applications flagged for V5 identity review in the 2026–27 federal fraud sweep
new reject codes an aid office must resolve by hand before aid can pay
of aid offices report staffing shortages (NASFAA 2025)
A 74/75 reject takes a person. So does the FAA Fraud Override. V4/V5 outcomes go back on a reporting clock, and a professional-judgment appeal needs a decision. Eli's demo works those queues, and staff gate every call. The card is a professional-judgment case, mid-review.
Recompute SAI with documented income loss, then route for a professional-judgment decision.
Your office still works the 74/75 reject, the Fraud Override, V4/V5 reporting, SAP against policy and the federal floor, R2T4, and the program-review file behind all of it. Eli runs that queue. A person signs every decision. One record holds it.
Synthetic demonstration. The point-tool column describes a typical fraud-scoring scope; check a specific vendor's current capabilities. Fraud-screening and reporting figures from U.S. Department of Education / Federal Student Aid; staffing figures from the NASFAA 2025 Administrative Burden survey. The demo stages field-level actions in a connector simulator or governed file handoff; production writes need a scoped integration and staff-controlled authorization.