Skip to main content
EEliSAP AppealsOther workflows

Satisfactory academic progress

Put the next appeal decision in front of the right person.

The failed standard, the student's explanation, and the next checkpoint.

2 of 3 cases need attention

Choose a case and continue from its current handoff.

Ready for decision

Maya Thompson

Appeal explains what changed

Current case

Sample case status

Needs review
Issue

The student fell below the pace standard during surgery and has provided a return-to-study plan.

Next action

Review the appeal and decide whether a one-term plan is appropriate.

Owner
Staff
Due
Next in queue
Amount
No dollar change
Impact
2 of 4 steps complete
GPA
2.18
Pace
62%
Required pace
67%
Documents
Complete

Case progress

2 / 4
  1. Completed step ✓

    Appeal and records received

    Maya submitted her statement, medical record, and return-to-study plan.

  2. Completed step ✓

    Policy checks prepared

    Eli confirmed the 62% pace failure, documented circumstance, and proposed checkpoint.

  3. Current step 3

    Approve the one-term plan

    Review the appeal and decide whether a one-term plan is appropriate.

  4. Upcoming step 4

    Send the notice and schedule monitoring

    Send the decision notice, assign the nine-credit and 2.0 term-GPA checkpoint, and move the case out of the appeal queue.

Evidence and calculation
  • • Medical documentation received
  • • Student explanation complete
  • • Proposed academic plan attached

The workflow

Source record to finished work

  1. 1Collect the appeal and documents
  2. 2Review the failed standard and what changed
  3. 3Record the decision and next checkpoint

Test it against your process

Use three recent de-identified appeals and the school's current SAP policy.

Talk about a test
Sample data only. Staff authorize decisions and system changes. An institution can choose to close exact no-change matches automatically.